technology · digitalizationBreakingMost read

Global AI Push

The UN's new AI Governance for Humanity Lab in Valencia aims to help countries align regulatory systems and turn principles into practical policy.

Ahmet Balakan
Global AI Push

International organizations are rapidly increasing their focus on artificial intelligence and advanced technologies in 2026. The United Nations, World Bank, NATO and European financial institutions are no longer treating AI simply as an emerging digital tool. It is increasingly being approached as strategic infrastructure capable of influencing economic development, security, public services and global competitiveness.

The shift is important because international organizations play a different role from technology companies. Instead of developing a single commercial AI product, they are directing capital, establishing standards, supporting startups, financing infrastructure and helping countries build the foundations needed to adopt new technologies.

The UN Builds a Global AI Architecture

The United Nations is focusing primarily on governance and international coordination.

In July 2026, the UN's Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence published its first preliminary assessment of AI's opportunities, risks and impacts. The panel brings together experts from different regions and is intended to provide an independent scientific foundation for international AI policy. Its first comprehensive report is expected in 2027.

The UN has also established an AI Governance for Humanity Lab in Valencia. Launched in May, the initiative is designed to help countries compare regulatory systems, improve interoperability between AI governance frameworks and turn international principles into practical policies.

This demonstrates an important evolution in the UN's role. The organization is moving from discussing the implications of AI toward building institutions specifically designed to govern it.

World Bank Turns AI Into Development Policy

For the World Bank, the central question is different: can AI accelerate development in poorer countries?

Its World Development Report 2026 argues that artificial intelligence could allow developing economies to achieve in a decade advances that might otherwise have taken much longer. The Bank estimates that 16.2% of jobs in developing economies could experience meaningful productivity improvements from AI.

The strategy does not require every country to construct enormous data centers or develop frontier models.

Instead, the World Bank advocates a three-stage approach: adopt existing technologies, adapt them to local conditions and gradually advance toward more sophisticated AI capabilities.

Healthcare provides a clear example. A relatively inexpensive AI system adapted to local languages could help medical workers in regions where specialist doctors are scarce. Similar systems could support teachers, farmers, courts and public administrations.

But the Bank emphasizes that AI investment begins with basic infrastructure.

Electricity, internet connectivity, computing capacity, local data and skilled workers are prerequisites. Through Mission 300, the World Bank and partners are already working toward providing electricity access to 300 million people in Sub-Saharan Africa by 2030—a foundation that could also expand future digital and AI adoption.

NATO Accelerates Military Technology

NATO is approaching technology from a security perspective.

Its Defence Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic, known as DIANA, has expanded significantly. The 2026 program includes 150 innovators connected to a network of around 200 test centers and more than 600 mentors across the Alliance.

The technologies extend beyond conventional weapons.

Artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, quantum technologies, cybersecurity, advanced sensors, space technologies and underwater robotics are increasingly part of NATO's innovation ecosystem.

In July, DIANA selected ten technology companies for a program focused on improving military decision-making. Their AI, machine-learning and software systems will be tested for applications including modeling, simulation, operational planning and targeting support. Each company receives €100,000 for integration and demonstration work.

The broader objective is speed.

Traditional military procurement can take years. NATO increasingly wants promising technologies to move from startups and laboratories into operational environments much faster.

NATO's €1 Billion Technology Fund

Financing is becoming another part of the strategy.

The NATO Innovation Fund is a €1 billion multi-sovereign venture-capital mechanism involving 24 participating Allied countries. It invests in breakthrough deep technologies with potential defense and security applications.

NATO is simultaneously trying to attract much larger amounts of private capital.

At its Ankara summit events in July, the Alliance called on banks and other financial institutions to increase lending and equity investment in defense, security, resilience and innovation. NATO is promoting public-private investment structures alongside government spending.

This indicates a broader transformation: international security organizations are beginning to operate partly as connectors between governments, technology startups, manufacturers and financial markets.

Europe Mobilizes Capital for AI

European financial institutions are pursuing a similar strategy in the civilian economy.

The European Investment Bank's 2026–2028 operational plan places strategic technologies among its priorities. It includes support for AI development, sustainable data centers, cybersecurity, semiconductor ecosystems and an AI Finance Lab, alongside assistance for Europe's planned AI Gigafactories.

The EIB Group is also providing advisory support for large-scale European AI computing facilities while financing companies across the semiconductor supply chain.

This matters because training increasingly sophisticated AI models requires enormous computing infrastructure.

Europe's challenge is therefore not simply producing algorithms. It needs processors, electricity, data centers, cloud infrastructure and financing capable of supporting them.

International financial institutions are increasingly being used to reduce investment risk so private capital will enter these expensive projects.

AI Becomes a Digital Public Good

Another important debate concerns who should control artificial intelligence.

In June, the UN Office for Digital and Emerging Technologies, United Nations University Macau and the Asian Development Bank published research examining when AI systems should qualify as Digital Public Goods.

The concept could become particularly important for developing countries.

Instead of every government depending entirely on expensive proprietary platforms, some AI systems could be built around open technologies that can be adapted to local languages and public-service requirements.

But the organizations stressed that openness alone is insufficient. AI systems intended for public use also require accountability, safeguards, demonstrated public value and local relevance.

The Technology Race Becomes Institutional

The global technology competition is therefore expanding beyond states and corporations.

The United States and China remain the two dominant technological powers. Major companies continue to spend tens of billions of dollars on computing infrastructure and AI development.

But international organizations are creating another layer of the ecosystem.

The UN is building governance mechanisms.

The World Bank is connecting AI with development.

The EIB is helping finance computing and semiconductor infrastructure.

And NATO is accelerating military and dual-use technology through investment, startups and testing networks.

The UN's 2026 scientific horizon assessment captures the scale of the transition: AI is evolving from a collection of individual tools into system-level infrastructure affecting development, security and international governance.

The next stage of the global technology race may therefore not be determined solely by which country develops the most powerful AI model.

It may also depend on which international institutions can finance, govern and distribute technological capabilities across borders most effectively.

A

Ahmet Balakan

Contributing writer at EUReflect.